(Inautonews.com-GMM) Stefano Domenicali has laid out the stall as formula one teams prepareto get tough in negotiations about the sport’s future.
Politics have returned to the F1 paddock in the form of a powerful consortium
expressing interest in buying F1’s commercial rights from CVC, amid the backdrop of
the expiring Concorde Agreement.
The term ‘breakaway’ is not being thrown about as it was amid the last political
battle two years ago, but Eric Boullier – now a major player in the F1 teams
association FOTA – made the body’s warning clear in Turkey.
Referring to the 2012 agreement between the teams and the current F1 owners, the
Renault boss said: “After that, there is nothing binding the teams to FOM (Formula
It is an obvious suggestion that the teams not only want more income beyond 2012,
but also key changes.
“We want clear rules, stability in the regulations, the return of some European
circuits, a reduction in ticket prices, and finally a closer relationship with the
public and especially the younger generation,” Ferrari team boss Domenicali is
quoted by O Estado de S.Paulo newspaper.
An unnamed source told the newspaper there is some dissatisfaction with the role CVC
has played since the London based private equity firm bought F1, implying there is a
risk the teams will actively back the News Corp/Exor buyout.
“We need a partner who is interested in formula one, who wants to develop with us
and not just collect the profits we generate,” the team source said.
“This partner should come with a new proposal, where we (the teams) can participate
in the discussions that relate to our interests,” he added.
As the new political stage is set, there have been rumblings of disunity within
FOTA, but the body’s chairman Martin Whitmarsh told the Neue Zurcher Zeitung
newspaper that harmony on that front is vital.
“Even if we fight each Sunday, we have common interests,” he said.
“We are competing not only against other sports, but also a thousand other forms of
entertainment. So we need stability, growth and sustainability. Who has the rights
is then less important,” he added.