InAutoNews InAutoNews

News

Ecclestone admits double points rule aimed at aiding Ferrari

Bernie Ecclestone revealed the controversial double points rule for Formula One's 2014 season was introduced to help Ferrari, citing the team's recent lack of performance.

By Steve James Updated
Bernie Ecclestone
Bernie Ecclestone No machine-readable author provided. PaddyBriggs~commonswiki assumed (based on copyright claims). / Public domain

Ferrari, one of Formula One’s most iconic teams, had not won a drivers’ or constructors’ championship since 2008. In the years leading up to 2014, Red Bull Racing dominated both titles, with Sebastian Vettel securing four consecutive drivers’ championships from 2010 to 2013. This period saw Ferrari fall behind in both performance and results, prompting concerns about the competitiveness and appeal of the championship, especially for fans and commercial stakeholders hoping for a more open title fight.

Background: Ferrari's Struggles and F1's Competitive Landscape

The Introduction of the Double Points Rule

Against this backdrop, Formula One announced a significant rule change in December 2013: the introduction of double points for the final race of the 2014 season. The intention was to keep the championship battle alive until the very end, theoretically giving teams with a points deficit a greater chance to challenge for the title at the season finale in Abu Dhabi. Under the new regulation, all points awarded in the last race would be doubled, affecting every finishing position and potentially altering the outcome of the championship.

Ecclestone’s Admission and Montezemolo’s Response

Bernie Ecclestone, then chief executive of Formula One, later revealed that the double points rule was conceived with Ferrari in mind. Speaking to business journalist Christian Sylt, Ecclestone explained that the regulation was designed to help the sport’s most famous team after its run of poor results. According to Ecclestone, he told Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo that the rule was introduced because Ferrari was not performing as expected, and that if Ferrari had been more competitive, there would have been no need for such a measure. Ecclestone claimed Montezemolo privately acknowledged this reasoning, even though he publicly criticised the rule.

Public Criticism and Reaction within Formula One

The double points rule was met with widespread disapproval from fans, teams, and drivers. Many argued that it undermined the integrity of the championship by introducing an artificial element that could unfairly influence the outcome. Montezemolo himself publicly described the idea as “too artificial” and expressed doubt that it would last, reflecting the broader sentiment within the paddock. Critics saw the rule as a departure from the sport’s traditions, prioritising spectacle and commercial interests over sporting merit.

How the Double Points Rule Worked

The double points rule applied exclusively to the final race of the 2014 season, the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. Normally, the winner of a Grand Prix would receive 25 points, but under the new rule, the winner in Abu Dhabi received 50 points, with all other points positions similarly doubled. This meant that a single race could have a much greater impact on the championship standings than any other event on the calendar.

Outcome and Legacy of the Double Points Rule

Despite the controversy, the double points rule did not ultimately change the outcome of the 2014 championship. Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton won the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix and secured the drivers’ title, while his team also clinched the constructors’ championship. The rule was not retained for subsequent seasons, as the backlash from teams and fans made clear its lack of support within the sport. The episode, however, remains a notable example of how Formula One’s leadership has sometimes intervened with rule changes aimed at maintaining interest and competitiveness, particularly when a leading team like Ferrari is struggling.

Implications for Formula One Governance

Ecclestone’s admission that the double points rule was intended to help Ferrari has continued to fuel debate about the motivations behind regulatory changes in Formula One. The incident is frequently cited in discussions about the balance between sporting fairness and the commercial interests that drive decision-making at the highest levels of the sport. While the rule was short-lived, it highlighted the challenges faced by F1’s leadership in keeping the championship both competitive and credible in the eyes of fans and participants alike.

Summary Table: Double Points Rule in 2014

Key Facts about the Double Points Rule
AspectDetails
Rule IntroductionAnnounced December 2013
ApplicationOnly to 2014 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix
Points AwardedDouble the standard points for all positions
Stated PurposeKeep championship fight alive
Ecclestone’s ReasoningTo help Ferrari after poor results
Public ReactionWidespread criticism from fans, teams, drivers
Rule DurationUsed only in 2014, then abolished

More from News

Peter Sauber portrait
News

Sauber stirs speculation over Volkswagen Formula 1 partnership

Flavio Briatore at the Chinese Grand Prix
News

Flavio Briatore Ends Speculation Over Formula One Return

Mercedes-AMG F1 W14 E Performance Formula 1 car
Motorsport

Hamilton’s Singapore podium bid undone by Virtual Safety Car call

F1 cars battling for the podium at the 2022 British Grand Prix
Motorsport

Formula 1 signs 10-year deal for Rwanda Grand Prix return